Banner
Workflow

Government to Amend the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Contact Counsellor

Government to Amend the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

  • Recently MoEFCC proposed amendments to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to scale down punishment for some environmental violations.

Proposed amendments

  • Amendments have been proposed in four legislations:
  • The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and
  • Public Liability Insurance (PLI) Act, 1991.
  • These are environmental laws that led to the creation of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
  • It can take action against individuals and corporate bodies who pollute air, water and land.
  • It can either shut down a polluting industrial body or imprison executives of an organisation found to be environmental violators.
  • Environment Ministry proposes to modify provisions of Environment Protection Act (EPA), by replacing imprisonment clauses with ones that only require violators to pay a fine.
  • It doesn’t apply to violations that cause grave injury or loss of life.

How will violators be punished?

  • Proposed changes include appointment of an ‘adjudication officer’.
  • To decide penalty in cases of environmental violations
  • Funds collected as penalties would be accrued in an “Environmental Protection Fund.”
  • In case of contraventions of the Act, penalties could extend to anywhere from five lakh to five crores.
  • Clause on provision of jail term for first default has been sought to be removed.

Do these amendments defang environmental laws?

  • Current laws have had limited effectiveness.
  • Indian courts took between 9-33 years to clear backlog of cases for environmental violations.
  • In most cases, it is impossible to hold a specific individual in an organisation responsible for a specific crime given the burden of proof required.
  • New amendments have made certain categories of crimes ‘civil crimes’ making it easier to hold organisations accountable.
  • Criticism: Proposed penalties are meagre and open avenues for corruption.

Categories